• Art

  • Economics

  • Futurism

  • Humor

  • Interact

    • Amazon WishList
    • CafePress
    • My T-Shirt Designs
    • View David Veksler’s profile
  • Miscellaneous

  • Objectivists

  • Organizations:

  • Politics

  • Software

  • Technology

  • Web Design

  • Pages

  • Tag Cloud

  • RSS Objectivism Metablog Entries

  • Archives

  • Stats

    • Pages displayed : 13245
    • Unique visitors : 6075
    • Pages displayed in last 24 hours : 199
    • Unique visitors in last 24 hours : 131
    FireStats icon Powered by FireStats
  • Spam Blocked

  • Meta

  • In response to a comment by a friend who pointed out that the Bible expressly forbids usury, (as do all major world religions) I wrote a paragraph for Wikipedia presenting an argument in defense of usury.:

    The primary argument given in defense of usury is that charging
    interest is essential to guiding the investment process, which
    cannot be sustained by charity even it were forthcoming due to the economic calculation problem. (In other words, interest rates are required to direct
    investments to their most productive use.) According to this argument, interest-driven investment is essential to economic
    growth, and therefore to the very existence of industrial civilization. If charging interest were outlawed, industrial
    societies would quickly collapse due to the inability to efficiently allocate savings.

    In addition to the defense of interest as such, the practice of
    charging high interest rates backed up by the threat of
    violence is also defended by those who point out that high interest
    rates reflect the very fact that the loans are being given to
    creditors with a high risk of default. The need for violence is due to
    the failure of governments to see this fact, or to
    adequately enforce the loan contracts (such as with overly lax
    bankruptcy laws), rather than any immorality inherent in
    moneylenders. Free-market economists point out that there is no such
    thing as a “just” interest rate because interest
    rates in a free market move towards an equilibrium determined by the time-preferences of individual debtors and lenders.

    2 Responses to “Defending Usury”

    Nice post on a topic I hadn’t thought too much about before!

    – Gus

    All well & good to taut usury. Seems you never read chapter 6 “Capitalism: the Unknown Ideal” (by Alan Greenspan) or “Atlas Shrugged”for that matter.~~~~

    Something to say?