Thoughts on man and his universe
Archive for February, 2004
Top Twelve Reasons Not to Support Gay Marriage
127 years ago
I came across “Top Twelve Reasons Not to Support Gay Marriage” at Neurosophy and would like to include it here, since the list seems to be in the public domain. (The only one I disagree with is #8.)
(more…)
The “Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act”
07 years ago
One of the main reasons the Internet has been so successful in the last decade is the fierce resistance given in response to meddling politicians who want to protect us from ourselves. Most of the laws that have been passed to regulate the web have either been ruled unconstitutional, or were completely useless and ineffective.
There is one bill however that has been particularly destructive and dishonest – the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998. Most of it was overturned by the Supreme Court, but one of the provisions that remained is TITLE XIII, which requires parental permission to collect personal information from any child under 13 years of age. “Parental permission” means that a parent must submit their personal information, and a verification of their age using something like a valid credit card. Most websites cannot afford to install such a complex verification system – nor can they afford the legal liability if ingenious kids circumvent that system. Neither will the parents of most 13 year olds submit their credit card numbers to an unknown website. In practice, the majority of community websites that require some information for participation simply say “By Federal Law, ALL applicants MUST be 13 years of age or older.”
When faced with such a notice, 99% of kids will simply lie about their age. This is fine for them, but not for the website operators, who are forced to either not collect any information at all, or to ban children from using their website (and hence not be able to market to them.) This is why there are no child-oriented online communities on the web that I’m aware of. There are many child-oriented sites of course, but by “community,” I mean a place where individuals can interact with each other and build online personas – something that requires at least a username and email address. The few websites that can afford to spend millions on the technical and legal challenges necessary for children to register usually ban children from its online forums and communities anyway – encouraging them to lie even when parental consent is possible.
In short, the government’s attempt to “protect” children has wiped out a major market niche, taught children to lie from an early age, and forced them to move their communities to underground IRC channels and general audience sites – exposing them to much more risk then a properly moderated child-oriented site would. It has also set a precedent for online censorship, one that the Supreme Court has mostly rebuffed, but may not do so in the future.
Go CIA!
07 years ago
I can’t say how true this is, but it’s certainly a great story:
In January 1982, President Ronald Reagan approved a CIA plan to sabotage the economy of the Soviet Union through covert transfers of technology that contained hidden malfunctions, including software that later triggered a huge explosion in a Siberian natural gas pipeline, according to a new memoir by a Reagan White House official.
Anti-China Protest in Taiwan
17 years ago
Wow:
More than 2.5 million people joined hands to form a 500-kilometre (310-mile) human chain stretching the length of Taiwan in a huge anti-China protest ahead of the island’s presidential elections next month, organisers said.
Limbaugh warns of danger to free speech
17 years ago
Well, I never expected this from the conservatives, but I’m glad that one of them finally had enough sense to say it:
The nation’s top radio host Rush Limbaugh warned of growing government intervention in broadcasting content.
Limbaugh made the comments after his parent company clear channel dropped Viacom’s Howard Stern from its stations.
‘Smut on tv gets praised. Smut on TV wins Emmys. On radio, there seems to be different standards,’ Limbaugh explained.
‘I’ve never heard Howard Stern. But when the federal government gets involved in this, i get a little frightened.
‘If we are going to sit by and let the federal government get involved in this, if the government is going to ‘censor’ what they think is right and wrong… What happens if a whole bunch of john Kerry’s, or terry McAuliffe’s start running this country. And decide conservative views are leading to violence?
‘I am in the free speech business. Its one thing for a company to determine if they are going to be party to it. Its another thing for the government to do it.’
Comanche Helicopter Scrapped
07 years ago
The Comanche helicopter program was scrapped today after $6.8 billion, 20 years of development, and not a single operational model. The helicopter was intended to oppose non-existent Soviet super-weapons, and after 1990, a non-existent Soviet empire. It took 13 years for the program to catch up with political reality. The helicopter has been featured in numerous movies, computer games, and television shows as the future of military technology. I think an observation made by my IT professor last week is appropriate: “Military contractors operate in a totally different universe. They have absolutely no conception of business reality, budget constraints, or product marketing — and thus have a very hard time applying military technology to civilian applications.”
While the military does need to develop new hardware, the current pork-driven ménage a trois between politicians, local constituencies, and defense contractors is not the right way to do it.
Flying Around
07 years ago
I probably won’t be doing much blogging in the near future. In addition to my usual hectic life, I got MS Flight Simulator 2004 yesterday, and will be spending most of my free time up in the clouds. Once my dvi-vga adapter comes in, I’ll be flying with 4 monitors.
0
7 years ago
Drudge has a review on the new book “Rumsfeld’s War.” Drudge picks out the primary reason why pacifists of all flavors despise him: “Rumsfeld changed the rules of fighting against terrorists, focusing on one primary goal- killing them.” Amen!
Update: The Washington Times has another good story on the book.
Gay Marriages in San Franscisco
07 years ago
Arnold Schwarzenegger has decided to take a stand against the orgy of gay marriages coming out of San Francisco City Hall. Whatever one thinks of the legitimacy of gay marriage, I think this is a brilliant move for City Hall and a win-win situation for everyone. The San Fran authorities obviously have a wonderful PR campaign on their hands. The media gets a controversial story full of suspense and intrigue. When will the courts stop the marriages? (Any day now.) Will they be declared null and void? (Probably.) Will there be a huge uprising with protests and mock marriages all over the nation? You bet! Conservatives aren’t left out in the cold either. Neo-fascist conservatives like Bill O’Reilly will score bonus points by decrying the “moral decay of America,” and the shadowy liberal conspiracy known as the “secular/humanist movement.”
I’m pleased with the move too — the hippies are too busy attacking “the institution of marriage” to protest capitalism and war on terror, and the conservatives are too distracted fighting a battle they lost 40 years ago to wage their campaign of FCC censorship. Meanwhile, politicians of both parties will be busy announcing “pro-marriage” bills and amendments (which have zero chance of long-term success) to figure out new ways to divorce me from my money. Since national politicians of both parties cannot afford to alienate a large percentage of their electorate, no kind of coherent stand for or against gay marriage will come out of Congress. The only loser in the whole thing is the rule of law, which City Hall has blatantly ignored – but then California laws are so screwed up as it is that it might not be such a bad thing.
“polluting our minds with unnecessary greed”
37 years ago
I ranted last month about the socialist rag produced by the business student council at my school. I had hoped that this was an anomaly, until I opened up the latest issue. Here is a quote from “Can’t Buy Me Love,” an editorial from a freshman business major:
Gullible consumers rush to the stores, confident that their new pair of Nikes will suddenly transform them into 6’5” NBA all-stars surrounded by flashy cars and beautiful models. What, you mean that’s not true? …. As silly as it may seem, we do fall for this ingenious plan, hatched by companies to seduce us to spend money. Why has materialism become such a huge problem?
With technology in the increase, our society has become so fast paced that people no longer bother to fully communicate with one another. Now instead of tucking their kids into bed ever night, busy parents can read them a bedtime story via videophone. This lack of attention results in families spending less and less time together. Dinner is eaten in front of the television and kids only come home to sleep…. The chance that companies will stop pushing products on us and polluting our minds with unnecessary greed is very slim. Therefore, the chance of resolving these problems falls on the average consumer’s shoulders.
On a more positive note, we discussed offshore outsourcing in my global IT systems class this week. Despite my professor’s best efforts to raise doubts about the benefits of outsourcing, virtually the entire class was united in the opinion that it was a good thing. When he suggested that CEO’s ought to value “human factors” above profits, one student exclaimed “why, that would be negligent!” The professor then proceeded to spend an hour writing dozens of complex diagrams and equations, all to make the point that out-outsourcing is attractive because foreign IT workers get paid less, although “there’s no reason to think that they’re less productive than Americans.”
New Objectivist Community!
07 years ago
Do you want to take a leading
role in America’s intellectual renaissance? Are you interesting in
participating in an active Objectivist community on the web? Would you
like to exchange ideas in a forum that does not tolerate irrationality?
To provide all this and more, ObjectivismOnline.net has been created to
bring together the vast resources on Objectivism that are scattered all
across the Internet into one integrated marketplace. We believe that
the Internet is a key tool to spread the ideas of Objectivism, and would like to invite you to join us. ObjectivismOnline.net has
many features that make it the best marketplace for Objectivist ideas
on the Internet today:
-
A meta-blog combining original content,
commentary on latest news and events, links to great articles on the
web, and announcements about new Objectivist events, essays, books, and
more! -
Our forum,
now in existence for over a year, brings the opportunity for extensive
dialogue with Objectivist intellectuals all across the world on topics
such as metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, art, science, and
more! Our forum recently broke the 3,000 posts mark and has over 185
registered members. -
An essay
section which serves as a resource for Objectivist ideas from all the
branch of philosophy as well as other essays of philosophical interest.
We currently have 35 essays and would like to greatly increase that
with your submissions. -
A chat
room specifically for our users. We plan to use this chat room for
informal chats as well as moderated discussions on various
philosophical and informal topics! -
Our web links section brings together Objectivism-related resources
from all corners of the web. With 112 current links and more on the
way, you can find a vast resource of ideas currently being spread! -
Additional features include: a movie/music/book reviews section, photo
and art galleries, and fliers for Objectivism clubs! Soon, we will be
adding an in-depth marketplace where you can find reviews on a variety
of products through amazon.com ranging from books to music to DVD’s and
much more!
We are currently looking for volunteers to participate in this blog. If you are interested, please leave a comment or contact me.
a quick look at the Win2k source
07 years ago
LMAO: “We Are Morons: a quick look at the Win2k source.”
Interesting: Commercial software aided reboot on Mars.
An Islamic “human rights” group
27 years ago
The video you are about to watch is a rap video designed to inspire people to take up jihad against the West. Posted on a radical Islamic website based out of the United Kingdom, the video is undeniably entertaining, as professionally produced as any video you might see on MTV. Consider the irony: radical fundamentalism, sworn to destroy Western culture and beliefs, uses that culture to market its hate. Paralleling the same deception, the Islamic organization that produced and marketed this video claims to be an Islamic “human rights” group but in reality is a group sworn to support the killing of Jews, Christians and moderate Muslims.
“An American Foreign Policy for a Unipolar World”
07 years ago
Check out Charles Krauthammer’s awesome speech: “Democratic Realism: An American Foreign Policy for a Unipolar World”. This is definitely one of the best and most insightful foreign policy talks I’ve ever read.
All of whom “just turned 18″, I’m sure…
27 years ago
Harvard University voted yesterday to approve a student-run magazine that will feature nude pictures of Harvard undergraduates and articles about sexual issues.
At this point, I could write a brilliant philosophical rant on how the vote was a liberal echo of the FCC’s “anti-indecency” jihad, ultimately stemming from a corruption of the concept of “censorship” by both sides, but uh, where do I send for my subscription??
Recent Comments